
Learnosity vs SimpliAssess for Aviation Training
Aviation Learnosity alternatives are assessment platforms that an aviation training organization can shortlist instead of, or beside, Learnosity, an API toolkit for building exams inside your own product. The right pick depends less on feature counts than on who builds the exam screens and who proves the controls.
This guide is for heads of training, quality managers and exam officers at approved training organizations, maintenance schools and small companies that sell aviation courses. It uses only facts the vendors publish, as of October 2026, and says “not published” where a page is silent.
This comparison rests on published documentation only. No product was tested, and neither vendor’s pages that we read claim approval by an aviation authority. It covers Learnosity and SimpliAssess, which publishes this site, so read its rows with that in mind. As of October 2026, searches for Learnosity alternatives mostly return software directories suggesting tools such as Canvas, Typeform and Kahoot, with nothing on aviation. The earlier post on Learnosity alternatives for small training companies covers general criteria. This one adds an aviation criteria table, a fit guide by organization type and a one-week trial script.
Key takeaways
- Learnosity is an API toolkit your developers embed in your own portal, while SimpliAssess is a white-label, headless platform with published customization services, so the main decision is who builds the exam experience.
- Neither vendor can tell you what your regulator expects: read the requirement text and ask your Competent Authority or FAA office, then test the tool against it.
- The gaps to close in writing before you buy are secure delivery, data hosting region, image-based items, item bank history and human review of AI-drafted questions.
- Trial both tools with original illustrative items only, and never load real exam questions or examiner material into a vendor sandbox.
How are Learnosity and SimpliAssess built differently?
Learnosity is an assessment API toolkit: your developers embed its authoring, delivery, scoring and reporting into your own product. SimpliAssess describes itself as an AI driven headless assessment platform with white-label brand control and custom development services. Both are API-first, so the real difference is how much of the exam experience you build yourself.
Learnosity’s homepage calls its Build product “An assessment API toolkit that fast-tracks your custom build” (quoted) and names its audience as publishers, platforms and product teams. Its sample code signs requests on your own server, so expect integration work by your developers.
SimpliAssess’s features page lists item banking, test management, examinee management, schedule management, tag management, analytics and reporting, and bulk import. Premium items include complete brand control, ready-to-use source code and unlimited customizations. The page gives names, not descriptions, for most of these. For the architecture behind both models, see our explainer on a headless assessment platform.
What do aviation rules say about the exam tool?
The rules we read regulate your examinations and records, not your software brand. They allow computer-based examinations and place assessment procedures and recordkeeping inside your quality system. A tool can support those procedures, but it cannot make an organization compliant. Check your Competent Authority or FAA office for local expectations.
The EASA AMC and GM to Part-147 (Issue 2, dated 17 December 2015, the issue we could read) says under AMC 147.A.135: “Examinations may be computer- or hard-copy-based or a combination of both” (quoted). It adds: “The actual questions to be used in a particular examination should be determined by the examiners” (quoted). Check the current amendment, because this issue is old.
For FAA-certificated schools, 14 CFR 147.23(b), as shown on eCFR for Part 147 on October 15, 2026, says a quality control system “must provide procedures for recordkeeping, assessment, issuing credit, issuing of final course grades, attendance” (quoted).
Neither passage names a product. Our reading, not a regulatory statement, is that two practical tests follow. Can an examiner control which items appear on an exam, and can you retrieve each assessment record in the form your quality system defines?
How do the aviation Learnosity alternatives compare on published facts?
On published facts, Learnosity documents more: a long question type list, an ISO 27001 certificate and a licensing structure. SimpliAssess publishes white-label brand control, ready-to-use source code and custom development support. Its pages are silent on several aviation-critical points, so those rows read “not published” and become questions for the vendor, not failures.
The table lists twelve criteria, why each matters in aviation training, and what each vendor publishes as of October 2026.
| Criterion | Why aviation cares | Learnosity (published) | SimpliAssess (published) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Product type | Decides who builds the exam screens | Assessment API toolkit you embed in your product | AI driven headless platform; standalone or inside an existing training setup |
| Branding | Learners should see your organization’s identity | Follows your own product, since you build the front end | Complete brand control; fully customizable white-labeling |
| Interactive and image items | Panels, diagrams and layouts | Help center lists hotspot, label image, drag and drop, order list and match list among 41 active types | FAQ lists multiple choice, true/false, fill in the blank, essay and open-ended; hotspot not published |
| Item bank | Content control and change history | Bulk analysis and update; comparison table says “with a full audit trail” | Item banking, tag management and bulk import named; version history not published |
| AI authoring | Faster drafting, but needs expert review | AI-assisted authoring and an AI item bank health check | AI drafts questions from articles, eBooks and websites; page describes automated psychometric checks and no human review step |
| Secure delivery | Invigilated rooms on controlled hardware | No secure browser of its own; works with third-party ones; focus tracking and hard time limits are configurable | General statement on secure online tests; no lockdown or proctoring method published |
| Security certification | Evidence for your quality system | ISO 27001:2022 certified, per its security document | No certification published; FAQ says data ownership stays with the customer |
| Data hosting region | EU, UK and US data rules | AWS regions including Ireland and Sydney, in two slightly different lists; multi-region hosting costs extra on Gold and Platinum support | Cloud-based; region not published |
| Reporting and export | Records an auditor can inspect | Out-of-the-box reports plus raw data through its Data API | Custom reports and charts; spreadsheet export of all scores |
| Integration | Link to training records and an LMS | Items, Reports and Data APIs named; LTI not mentioned on the pages we read | FAQ says LMS and SIS integration is available, with details on request |
| Pricing | Budget and renewal risk | Quote-based annual license by user tier; no prices shown | Not published; FAQ says plans exist and points to support |
| Support | Exam-day problems | Silver, Gold and Platinum plans with 99.8% to 99.9% uptime SLAs | FAQ states 24/7 support and dedicated account managers; no SLA published |
Sources, accessed October 25, 2026: Learnosity’s homepage, question types help article, testing security guide, security document and licensing page; SimpliAssess’s features, training companies, AI and FAQ pages. SimpliAssess’s case study index covers leadership training, professional services and e-learning, among others, and does not mention aviation. Learnosity’s homepage lists adult and vocational learning among its use cases and does not name aviation either.
Pro tip: Ask For The Exception Demo. Ask each vendor to show a learner losing connection mid-exam, an examiner voiding an attempt, and the restored attempt with its log. Happy-path demos look alike, and exceptions are where records tend to get thin.
Does secure delivery decide the choice for an aviation exam room?
Often yes, when exams run on controlled hardware in an invigilated room. Learnosity says it does not provide a secure browser and points to third-party ones, while SimpliAssess publishes no lockdown or proctoring method. Decide first whether your exams need lockdown software or whether invigilation plus platform settings is enough.
Learnosity’s help center says it “doesn’t specifically provide a secure browser” (quoted) and offers focus tracking where lockdown is impractical. Its testing security best practices article lists settings your developers must apply, such as hard time limits and removing answer validation data from the client.
Learnosity’s group also includes Questionmark, acquired in 2021, which markets browser lockdown, identity verification and online proctoring. That is a separate product with its own evaluation. SimpliAssess’s features page speaks of “proctoring and conducting secure & scalable online tests” (quoted) without naming methods. For neutral background on options, read proctoring for training providers, then write your security requirement before you ask either vendor.
How do the license terms differ?
Learnosity publishes its structure but not prices: annual SaaS licenses by user tier, per-user fees that fall with scale, and a quote after a sales conversation. SimpliAssess publishes no pricing. Compare quotes on identical scope, in writing, including the premium features and hosting options you need.
On its licensing page, Learnosity lists Standard, Scale and Enterprise tiers by user count. Premium assessments and premium analytics cost extra below Enterprise. Contracts auto-renew for a year unless you give 90 days’ notice. Review sites list their own starting prices, but those are not vendor-confirmed, so we do not repeat them.
Two aviation questions follow. Learnosity describes a user in terms of people you have sold a product with Learnosity access to, so ask how it would count a trainee in a school that does not sell a product. Ask SimpliAssess which plan covers white-label branding, custom development and your hosting needs.
Which of the aviation Learnosity alternatives fits your organization?
Learnosity fits aviation organizations with developers who will embed assessment in their own training portal. SimpliAssess fits organizations that want a branded platform without building the front end, once the vendor confirms the items marked “not published”. A team that needs built-in lockdown should shortlist products that publish it.
The table maps six common situations to a likely fit and the proof to request.
| Your situation | Likely fit | Proof to request before signing |
|---|---|---|
| In-house developers building a learner portal | Learnosity | Sandbox access, integration plan, how it defines a user |
| Small school or training company with no developers | SimpliAssess | Branded demo, hotspot items, hosting region, security documents |
| Selling aviation courses or exam prep to the public | Either | Billing model per learner; SimpliAssess lists payment gateway integration, with no gateways named |
| Exams on controlled hardware needing lockdown | Either, plus a tested secure browser, or a product that publishes lockdown | Named browser, version and a recorded test on your hardware |
| Strict data residency rules | Ask both | Written hosting region, subprocessors and the cost of region choice |
| Drafting questions with AI from your manuals | Either | Review workflow, data handling terms and rights to the source material |
If your only reason to look beyond Learnosity is price or developer time, the SimpliAssess features page shows what the platform lists. If you need broad image-based item types and a published ISO 27001 certificate today, Learnosity’s documentation answers more of those questions up front.
Pro tip: Price The Whole Build. Learnosity’s own comparison table sizes a Build project at one integration engineer plus your product team. Write down your developer hours for the first release and for each procedure change, then set that against the vendor customization quote on the other side.
How can you trial both tools in one week?
Run the same five steps on both tools using your own gate list, with original illustrative items only. A one-week trial exposes missing features, hidden configuration work and slow vendor answers faster than any demo. Record each result in a shared sheet, not in memory.
Step 1: Write your gates. List the must-haves: secure delivery method, hosting region, item-level export, branding and a named support contact. A vendor that fails a gate is out.
Step 2: Build twenty original items. Write them yourself, with at least five that need an image, such as a labeled diagram you drew. Never upload real exam items, question bank content or examiner material.
Step 3: Brand one exam. Apply your logo and colors, then open it as a learner on a phone and a controlled laptop. Note anything that shows a vendor name.
Step 4: Run exception drills. Drop the connection, extend time for one approved accommodation, void an attempt and restore one. Confirm that each action leaves a visible log.
Step 5: Rebuild one record. Export item-level results for a test learner and rebuild the full assessment record from the export. Ask for security documents and the hosting region in writing.
What should you do next?
Turn your gates and trial notes into a scored sheet. Our post on an aviation exam software RFP checklist covers weighting and vendor questions in more depth, so use it before you invite quotes.
If you also need to schedule courses and track certificates, SimpliTrain is a separate training platform from the same company as SimpliAssess. Its aviation page states that it supports delivery and tracking of EASA Part-147 Basic Training, Type Training and OJT completion. You can request a SimpliTrain demo and bring your gate list to it.
Frequently asked questions
Is Learnosity used in aviation training?
We could not confirm it. Learnosity’s homepage lists adult and vocational learning among its use cases but does not name aviation as a sector. Some aviation organizations may use it through their own products, so ask the vendor for aviation references and judge the tool against your own gate list, not its logo wall.
Is Learnosity or SimpliAssess approved by EASA or the FAA?
No claim of approval appears on the vendor pages we read. The EASA and FAA passages quoted above address examinations, records and quality systems, not software brands. Your Competent Authority or FAA office decides what it expects from your organization, so treat any “compliant” label as a vendor statement to verify.
Does Learnosity provide a secure browser?
No. Its help center says it does not specifically provide a secure browser and points to third-party products installed on the exam computer. It also describes focus tracking, with live progress reports and player event handlers, for settings where lockdown is impractical. Confirm which secure browser it has been tested with on your hardware.
How much does Learnosity cost?
Learnosity publishes no prices. Its licensing page describes annual SaaS licenses by user tier, per-user fees that fall as volume grows, and extras such as premium assessments, premium analytics and multi-region hosting depending on tier and support plan. You get a quote after a sales conversation, so ask for scope and renewal terms in writing.
Do I need developers to use Learnosity?
Plan on it. Learnosity describes itself as an assessment API toolkit for product teams, its sample code signs requests on your server, and its own comparison table sizes a Build project at one integration engineer plus your product team. A school without developers should price outside help before shortlisting it.
Can SimpliAssess run hotspot questions for aircraft diagrams?
SimpliAssess’s published pages do not say. Its FAQ lists multiple choice, true/false, fill in the blank, essay and open-ended questions with customizable formats, and it does not name hotspot or image labeling. Ask for a live demo using one of your own illustrative diagram items before you rely on it.
Can I use AI to write aviation exam questions?
Both vendors publish AI-assisted authoring, but treat output as a first draft only. SimpliAssess’s AI page describes automated psychometric checks and says nothing about human review, so keep subject-matter expert sign-off in your own process. Do not feed real exam questions or restricted material into any AI tool.


